JIS S30C Steel: AISI 1030 Equivalent, Properties & Heat Treatment

steel

JIS S30C is a medium-carbon machine structural steel defined under JIS G4051, with a carbon content of 0.27–0.33%. It is the first grade in the G4051 series where the manganese range steps up to 0.60–0.90%, meaningfully improving hardenability over S25C. Through-hardening to HRC 50–55 on small sections is practical, and induction hardening is a common surface treatment. Internationally it matches AISI 1030 (USA) and aligns closely with DIN C30 (Germany).

Table of Contents
  1. International Equivalent Grades
  2. Chemical Composition
  3. Mechanical Properties
  4. Physical Properties
  5. Heat Treatment Conditions
  6. Machinability
  7. Weldability
  8. Common Mistakes
  9. When to Choose S30C
  10. FAQ

1. International Equivalent Grades

Standard Grade Region Match Type
JIS G4051 S30C Japan Reference
ASTM / AISI 1030 USA ✅ Exact Match
ISO 683-1 C30 International ⚠️ Nearest Equivalent
DIN C30 / 1.0528 Germany ⚠️ Nearest Equivalent
EN C30E / 1.1178 Europe ⚠️ Nearest Equivalent
S30C and AISI 1030 are near-identical in carbon and manganese ranges, making them an exact match for most engineering applications. A minor carbon difference exists — JIS allows down to 0.27% C while ASTM starts at 0.28% — but this is inconsequential in practice. DIN C30 specifies a lower Mn minimum (0.50% vs. JIS 0.60%), meaning JIS S30C guarantees slightly better minimum hardenability. As with other JIS G4051 grades, S30C has tighter P and S limits than ASTM A29.

2. Chemical Composition

Element JIS S30C AISI 1030 DIN C30
C0.27–0.33%0.28–0.34%0.27–0.34%
Si0.15–0.35%0.10–0.35%≤ 0.40%
Mn0.60–0.90%0.60–0.90%0.50–0.80%
P≤ 0.030%≤ 0.040%≤ 0.045%
S≤ 0.035%≤ 0.050%≤ 0.045%

Sources: JIS G4051:2016, ASTM A29/A29M, DIN EN 10083-2

Starting at S30C, JIS G4051 raises the manganese range from 0.30–0.60% (S20C, S25C) to 0.60–0.90%. This step-up meaningfully improves hardenability and is one reason S30C through-hardens more effectively than S25C despite only a 0.05% increase in carbon.

3. Mechanical Properties

As-normalized

Property Value (Metric) Value (Imperial)
Tensile Strength≥ 470 MPa≥ 68.2 ksi
Yield Point≥ 295 MPa≥ 42.8 ksi
Elongation (GL=5d)≥ 21%≥ 21%
Reduction of Area≥ 50%≥ 50%
Hardness137–197 HB137–197 HB

After through-hardening + temper (sections ≤ 30 mm / 1.2 in)

Property Water Quench Oil Quench
Surface Hardness (as-quenched)HRC 50–55HRC 42–50
Hardness after temper at 550–650°C (1022–1202°F)HRC 25–35HRC 22–32

4. Physical Properties

Property Value (Metric) Value (Imperial)
Density7.85 g/cm³0.284 lb/in³
Young’s Modulus206 GPa29,900 ksi
Thermal Conductivity50 W/(m·K)347 BTU·in/(hr·ft²·°F)
Thermal Expansion (20–100°C / 68–212°F)11.5 × 10⁻⁶ /°C6.4 × 10⁻⁶ /°F
Specific Heat~486 J/(kg·K)0.116 BTU/(lb·°F)

5. Heat Treatment Conditions

Process Temperature Cooling Purpose
Normalizing860–900°C (1580–1652°F)Air coolRefine grain, relieve stress
Annealing830–870°C (1526–1598°F)Furnace coolSoften for machining
Through-Hardening (quench)840–880°C (1544–1616°F)Water or oil quenchFull-section hardening
Tempering (post through-harden)550–650°C (1022–1202°F)Air coolRestore toughness
Induction Hardening870–920°C surface (1598–1688°F)Water or oil quenchSurface hardening to HRC 50–55
⚠ Carburizing is not recommended for S30C S30C’s carbon content is too high for effective carburizing. The elevated core carbon reduces toughness after the carburizing cycle, negating the key advantage of the process. For carburized parts, specify S20C or S15C instead.

6. Machinability

S30C machines comparably to AISI 1030. The higher manganese content (vs. S25C) contributes marginally to chip formation and slightly improves surface finish relative to lower-Mn grades at the same carbon level.

  • Machinability rating: approximately 60–65% relative to AISI 1212 baseline (100%)
  • Normalized condition recommended for rough and semi-finish machining
  • Finish grinding required after induction hardening or through-hardening
  • Positive-rake tooling reduces cutting forces in the soft condition

7. Weldability

S30C marks the start of the range where preheat becomes a practical consideration. Its carbon equivalent (Ceq) of approximately 0.37–0.44 places it in the “conditionally weldable” zone.

  • Preheat: 75–100°C (167–212°F) recommended for sections over 25 mm (1 in); not mandatory for thin sections in low-restraint joints
  • Process: SMAW, GMAW, GTAW compatible; low-hydrogen consumables preferred
  • Filler: ER70S-6 for GMAW; E7018 for SMAW
  • Post-weld heat treatment: Stress relief at 550–600°C (1022–1112°F) recommended for high-restraint joints
⚠ Weldability boundary S30C is the grade where engineers should start treating weldability as a variable rather than an assumption. If frequent field welding or repair welding is expected in service, consider specifying S25C or SS400 instead to remove preheat requirements.

8. Common Mistakes

Mistake 1: Treating S30C and S25C as equivalent

The 0.05% carbon difference is secondary — the real change at S30C is the Mn range jumping from 0.60% max to 0.90% max. This makes S30C meaningfully more hardenable. Engineers who treat the two grades as interchangeable risk under- or over-hardening parts in through-hardening applications.

Mistake 2: Specifying S30C for carburizing

S30C is occasionally specified for carburized parts when the designer wants a “slightly tougher core.” In practice, the elevated carbon content makes the core harder but more brittle, which is the opposite of what carburizing aims to achieve. Use S20C or S15C for carburizing applications.

Mistake 3: Skipping preheat on thick sections

S30C’s Ceq sits in the range where hydrogen-induced cracking becomes possible without preheat, especially on sections over 25 mm (1 in) or in cold environments. Engineers accustomed to S20C and S25C (which rarely need preheat) may carry those assumptions into S30C work and encounter cold cracking.

9. When to Choose S30C

  • ✅ Small-to-medium through-hardened shafts, pins, and keys where HRC 50–55 surface is sufficient
  • ✅ Induction-hardened components requiring moderate surface hardness over a tough core
  • ✅ Applications where S25C lacks sufficient hardenability and S35C/S45C is over-specified
  • ✅ Cold-formed parts (bolts, studs) requiring moderate strength without alloy steel cost
  • ❌ Carburizing applications — use S20C or S15C
  • ❌ Large cross-sections (> 30 mm / 1.2 in) requiring consistent through-hardness — upgrade to SCM420/SCM440
  • ❌ Structures requiring easy field weldability — use S25C or structural grades (SS400, SM400)

10. FAQ

Q: Is S30C exactly the same as AISI 1030?

Very close. The carbon ranges overlap almost completely (JIS: 0.27–0.33%, ASTM: 0.28–0.34%). The manganese ranges are identical. JIS G4051 sets tighter P and S limits, making S30C marginally cleaner. For most mechanical applications, S30C and 1030 are fully interchangeable.

Q: What makes S30C different from S25C despite only 0.05% more carbon?

The carbon increase is secondary. The key change is the manganese range — S30C jumps to 0.60–0.90% Mn from S25C’s 0.30–0.60%. Higher Mn improves hardenability independently of carbon, so S30C through-hardens noticeably deeper and to higher hardness than S25C in the same section size.

Q: What surface hardness does induction hardening achieve on S30C?

Typically HRC 50–55 on the surface for sections in the 25–50 mm (1–2 in) range. This is lower than the HRC 55–62 achievable with S45C or S50C. For wear-critical applications requiring maximum surface hardness, specify a higher-carbon grade or a Cr-Mo alloy steel.

Q: How does S30C compare to S35C for through-hardening?

S35C (0.32–0.38% C, Mn 0.60–0.90%) sits just above S30C and achieves HRC 53–58 surface hardness under similar quenching conditions — meaningfully harder than S30C’s HRC 50–55. If the application requires hardness at the upper end of the carbon-steel range, S35C is the more appropriate choice.

Q: Can DIN C30 be used as a direct substitute for S30C?

In most cases, yes. The primary difference is DIN C30’s lower Mn minimum (0.50% vs. JIS 0.60%), which could produce slightly less consistent hardenability at the low end of the Mn range. For non-critical applications this is inconsequential; for precision heat-treatment work, verify the actual Mn content from the mill certificate.

comment